CSIRO: 97% Gloomy Religion

CSIRO boss defends shake-up, says politics of climate ‘more like religion than science’

Dr Marshall said he understood the concerns – from both abroad and his staff internally.

“I don’t blame our scientists for crying out – they’re passionate about what they do,” he said.

“When a scientist has spent 20 or 30 years working in a particular area, they love it, that’s what gets them out of bed in the morning – they’re not going to want to change.


Wait. What?

“they love it, that’s what gets them out of the bed in the morning”


What sort of person loves this?:

When the End of Human Civilization Is Your Day Job
Among many climate scientists, gloom has set in.

Things are worse than we think, but they can’t really talk about it.


Every Day.

Eternally Gloomy because their apocalypse fails to materialise.

Can’t talk about it.

Send money.

Worse Apocalypse. Ever.

CSIRO: Scientist dump 97%

Even Frasier would see the irony …

Scientists, whose job it is to predict the future, fail to predict their own future:

4 February, 2016:

The head of the CSIRO, Larry Marshall, said in a letter to staff on Thursday that the government’s science agency’s job had been “to prove climate change”.

“That question has been answered,” he told staff.

Continuing to do climate research would be akin to resting “on our laurels” and would be the “path to mediocrity”.

✈ ✈ ✈

Cue the 97% scientists who squawked  the mantra “the science is settled” now squeal “the science is not settled“:

Will Steffen, October 2013:

”We’d like to see a debate in this country that gets beyond these futile arguments about the science, which have been settled for decades in the scientific literature, and get on with the real debate about what is really the best way forward with dealing with the problem.

”So, yes, it is frustrating having to go back again and again and again and talk about what the science actually says.”

✈ ✈ ✈

Bonus Links

> CSIRO’s best solution:

November 13, 2011:  Carbon tax hit small: CSIRO

> Some History:

January 17, 2004: Global warming: a load of hot air?

The IPCC (and CSIRO) relied heavily on the Mann paper in coming to their global warming conclusions.




Global Warming Heroes or Zeroes?

I don’t want to even think about what the weather would be like if some Australians didn’t ride bicycles:

Cyclists are climate-change heroes but we are often treated as villains

“So there I was, separated from my partner and our three-year-old, standing with my bike, five heavy panniers, two tents, beach ball and guitar all strapped on, and, dare I say it, a stowaway.

Zero, our wiry-haired Jack Russell, is as significant a family member as anyone else in our little tribe. When we go travelling he always comes.

So why do we chose to travel like this?

But we want to make a difference, we have pretty much gone fossil-fuel cold turkey, and breaking rules has become part of our reality.”

✈ ✈ ✈

One man’s reality is another mans unreality:

How family planning could be part of the answer to climate change

“You’ve changed your lightbulbs, you recycle, you’ve retrofitted your house, cycle when you can, and drive an electric car when you can’t.

You’re doing your bit to reduce your carbon emissions and prevent dangerous climate change.

But if you have two children, your legacy of carbon emissions could be 40-times higher than those you saved through lifestyle changes.”

✈ ✈ ✈

Pet dogs as bad for planet as driving 4x4s, book claims

“Owners should consider doing without, downsizing or even eating their pets to help save the planet, according to a new book.

A medium-sized dog has the same impact as a Toyota Land Cruiser driven 6,000 miles a year, while a cat is equivalent to a Volkswagen Golf.”

✈ ✈ ✈   ✈ ✈ ✈   ✈ ✈ ✈   ✈ ✈ ✈   ✈ ✈ ✈   ✈ ✈ ✈

The 97% stupid. It hurts.

2015 Hottest Year Ever: The Antipodes

Australia – not so hot!

 UAH global satellite temperature data has been updated for December 2015.

Considering that this is arguably the strongest El Nino yet rivalling 1998 it seems that the Australian December turned out pretty average contrary to the claims of our local Climerati.


New Zealand – Not So hot!

WHAT some scientists are now describing as the strongest El Nino on record is the culprit behind a chilly and disappointing summer for the Gisborne-East Coast region.
Poor weather for Christmas
Those who thought it was a pretty poor Christmas/New Year for weather were right.
The figures show it was cold and miserable most of the time.
The tragedy of global warming … terrible …
However, despite the big dry, Australia experienced a number of significant ‘cold snaps’ throughout 2015, which produced snow in low-lying areas which normally don’t experience freezing conditions.

Al Gore. Climate Fraud Supremo.

12007Make a scientific statement like, “northern polar waters could be ice-free in summers within just 5-6 years.”.
Quote this whilst receiving your award, “Former US Vice President Al Gore cited Professor Maslowski’s analysis on Monday in his acceptance speech at the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony in Oslo.”

2. In 2011Admit you are wrong & “move the goal post“
“Scientists who predicted a few years ago that Arctic summers could be ice-free by 2013 now say summer sea ice will probably be gone in this decade.
The original prediction, made in 2007, gained Wieslaw Maslowski’s team a deal of criticism from some of their peers.
And one of the projections it comes out with is that the summer melt could lead to ice-free Arctic seas by 2016 – “plus or minus three years”.

3. October 4 2013Deny it ever happened –
“The clamor is being raised over Al Gore’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech quote supposedly saying that Arctic sea ice would be gone by 2013.- 1 What Gore did or didn’t say is beside the point …

Maslowski also did not say “by 2013″ in his original research in 2007 or when it was republished in 2009.
This grandstanding about sea ice and Gore, for whatever reason, is a huge and egregious deception.

The actual prediction from Maslowski’s 2009 publication is, “Autumn could become near ice free between 2011 and 2016.”

Al Gore. Climate fraud.

Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Climate Frauds

Australia’s BoM releases it’s Annual Climate Summary for 2012, but FAILS to document in their “Official Historic Record” the ONE climate event proves the BoM/ UN-IPCC junk climate science models WRONG.


The Annual Climate Summary 2012 report is the Bureau of Meteorology’s official historical record of the previous year’s climate.

It provides a national overview of temperate and rainfall during the year, and documents significant weather and climate events.

** The SIGNIFICANT WEATHER/CLIMATE EVENT the BoM LEFT OUT of it’s 2012 Climate Summary:

27 April 2012


Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Senator Joe Ludwig said the expiry of EC declarations in Bundarra and Eurobodalla next Monday marked a major milestone for agriculture in Australia.

“The extended period of drought – which made things tough for many on the land – is finally over,” Minister Ludwig said.

Remember, in Australia, weather IS NOW climate:

A few years ago, talking about weather and climate change in the same breath was a cardinal sin for scientists.

Now it has become impossible to have a conversation about the weather without discussing wider climate trends, according to researchers who prepared the Australian Climate Commission’s latest report.

Why would the BoM delete a climate event like a 12 year drought breaking climate event that it didn’t predict with it’s junk global warming science?

Because the Australian BoM is a Climate Fraudster.

The BoM are government funded climate tax frauds.

Jail these frauds.


Another UN-IPCC/BoM failure to predict drought breaking climate change:

May 6, 2013

New Zealand’s worst drought in 30 years is over

The drought has broken in New Zealand, marking an end to the driest period in 30 years.

Skeptical Science: Why it’s NOT science.

Weather is NOT climate

On 21 January 2013,  dana1981, or Dana Nuccitelli, of Skeptical Science, published an open letter to London Mayor Boris Johnson titled :

Weather is not Climate.”

At issue for dana1981 was the fact that the Mayor had commented that it was snowing in London in winter, and that the sun was to blame for any global warming.

Said dana1981, “Quite simply, weather is not climate.”

On March 04, 2013, the Climate Commission of Australia released a report titled, “The Angry Summer.”

The “Angry Summer” was “90 days, 123 records broken,” according to the Climate Commission, in association with the BoM and the CSIRO.

(What does 3,318 cold records set this week in U.S. say? Possibly a “Boiling Mad Winter”)

In particular, January 2013 was of concern for the BoM catastrophists, with a fiery armageddon for Planet Earth just a tipping point away.

At the very same time, in the same month, in London, it was ‘snowing in winter‘.

Weather is NOW climate

ALSO, on March 04, 2013, in support of, and as part of the propaganda, the Age newspaper, Australia, published this piece highlighting the Climate Commission’s latest report titled, “Climate change a key factor in extreme weather, experts say”:

A few years ago, talking about weather and climate change in the same breath was a cardinal sin for scientists.

Now it has become impossible to have a conversation about the weather without discussing wider climate trends, according to researchers who prepared the Australian Climate Commission’s latest report.

The report, The Angry Summer, says behind the litany of broken heat and rainfall records this year, a clear pattern has now emerged.”

Yes. Weather is NOW Climate according to the Australian Climate Commission, courtesy of “The Angry Summer.”

The Question for dana1981:

* Will dana1981 write an apology to the Mayor of London quoting the Climate Commission


* Will dana1981 write an open letter to the Australian Climate Commission correcting their assertion that Weather is NOW Climate


* Will dana1981 do neither, allowing the junk science deceit & lies to continue?

☞    Any acknowledgments, open letters, apologies  from dana1981 will be posted when available.

Bonus Links:

The Truth About Skeptical Science

Skeptical Science – Rewriting History.  (screen shots of before & after alterations and censorship)