Climate Frauds UN-IPCC exposed quoting fraudulently adjusted temperature data in court.

At a stroke this case may affirm that up to one quarter of our planet’s climate records have been fraudulently audited.

New Zealand skeptics of man-made global warming score historic legal victory as discredited government climate scientists perform U-turn and refuse to allow a third party peer-review report of official temperature adjustments to be shown in court.

New Zealand’s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) are reeling after what may prove a fatally embarrassing admission that it is breaking a solemn undertaking given to parliament.

As such, this would bring a swift victory for skeptics with profound legal ramifications around the world.

In the sparsely-measured southern hemisphere the New Zealand climate data is critical to claims about a verified global temperature record.

Read on @ John O’Sullivan’s Climate Realist blog:

http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=10030&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ClimaterealistsNewsBlog+%28ClimateRealists+News+Blog%29

(via Tom Nelson)

UPDATES:

Friday September 07

Climate change deniers swamped in NIWA court challenge

“The plaintiff does not succeed on any of its challenges to the three decisions of NIWA in issue. The application for judicial review is dismissed and judgment entered for the defendant.”

Justice Venning says Dunleavy “has no applicable qualifications” and “his interest in the area does not sufficiently qualify him as an expert”.

He also questioned the credentials of Bob Dedekind, a computer modelling and statistical analyst whose “general expertise in basic statistical techniques does not extend to any particular specialised experience of qualifications in the specific field of applying statistical techniques in the field of climate science”.

Joannenova , 7 Sept. 2012:

The NZ court case of skeptics versus NIWA has come down against the skeptics.

“By ruling that the evidence from Terry Dunleavy, and Bob Dedekind was inadmissible on the grounds of qualification, Justice Venning has done two things: a) he has apparently left the door open for an appeal or other form or review (precident might be an interesting thread to follow); and b) he has removed himself from the matter, and is no longer involved or able to comment.”

Rereke Whakaaro
September 7, 2012 at 10:14 pm     comment #5.1
UPDATE 12 Sept. 2012:
UPDATE 15 Sept. 2012:  
A judge has thrown out a legal challenge by climate change sceptics, which accused Government scientists of manipulating data. 
Wratt is a senior member of the IPCC, the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change, and is in agreement with the majority of the world’s climate scientists who say human-induced climate change is happening all around us and that the warming of the Earth and acidification of the oceans is reaching a critical stage.
Wratt’s frustration is not just at the sceptics but also at the attention they receive, given they are the minority.
The New Zealand Climate and Health Council, which says it has 150 medical professionals as members, said groups like the Climate Science Coalition were “still peddling lies that kill, they are delaying action essential to protect human health”.

Advertisements

Julia Gillard: Climate Fraud, Hypocrite

Hypocrisy.

Cognitive dissonance.

 

The main attributes required to be a ‘believer’ in catastrophic, alarmist man made global warming from carbon dioxide, released from carelessly burning fossil fuels.

For example, flying in airplanes is often cited as a main driver of dangerously warming the planet, destroying ecosystems, killing innocent animals.

And, so we note the latest demonstration of these features of eco warrior, hypocrite,  proven liar & climate fraud, Australian PM Julia Gillard.

On July 04, 2011:

JULIA Gillard has invoked a doomsday-like scenario of metre-high sea level rises and a 2000km southward shift of Australia’s climactic zones as she battles an opposition scare campaign over her proposed carbon tax.

Ms Gillard warned of threats to infrastructure, failures of urban drainage and sewerage systems, blackouts, transport disruption and private property damage as temperature rose by between 2.2 and 5 degrees by 2070.

“Now this is a huge change,”  Ms Gillard told reporters this morning.

“It is equivalent to the climate of Cairns being the climate of New South Wales.

So, if a temperature rise of  ‘between 2.2 and 5 degrees’ is so dangerous, where would you go for a holiday?

If you ‘knew’ of threats to infrastructure, failures of urban drainage and sewerage systems, blackouts, transport disruption and private property damage as temperature rose by between 2.2 and 5 degrees?

How would you travel to get there if you knew, on the best scientific advice, that burning fossil fuel was the cause, and advocated/legislated a carbon (sic) tax to change behaviour of the population to meet ‘climate debt‘ accrued from burning too much fossil fuel?

Walk/cycle to Melbourne?  Sail a boat to Tasmania? Antarctica?

Of course.

You would go to the north of Cairns, to Port Douglas in far north Queenslandto join the “fly and flop” crowd!

Australian PM JuLiar Gillard, Prime Climate Fraud & Hypocrite.

Greg Combet, Climate Fraud & Liar.

Today, Tuesday 10 July, 2012, The Minister for Klimate Kontrol, Greg Combet, answered ‘live’ on a blog, questions from readers.

At 10.00 am, the question, from Annie:

We are sick of your governments lies.The Carbon Tax is another lie. We are not allowed to say Carbon Tax. Why not ?

Why are you giving 10% of the Carbon Tax collected to the UN ?

Combet’s response @10.01 am:

Annie, this is incorrect – the Government is not giving any of the carbon price revenue to the UN. Every single cent raised by placing a price on pollution is being given to Aussie households, to support jobs in key industries, and to invest in clean energy.

This is a lie.

Australia announced its contribution of A$599 million in June 2010. Details of the package were jointly announced by the Hon. Greg Combet AM MP, Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, and the Hon. Kevin Rudd MP, Minister for Foreign Affairs, in Cancún, Mexico in late 2010.

Greg Combet is a liar.

Handcuff time for Greg Combet.

Kicking this lying fraud out  at the next election is not enough!

UPDATE: Combet reponds @ 10.22 am:

Mark M, the figure you are pointing to is part of Australia’s overseas aid budget and does not come from the carbon price revenue.

The Gillard Government is party to the UN agreement, which Climate Change Minister Greg Combet entered into in December 2010 at a meeting in Cancun, Mexico.

Under this agreement approximately 10 per cent of the Carbon Tax revenues raised from developed nations will go into a Green Climate Fund.

A click on the official government website provided above states that it (The Aust. Govt.) reports to the “Secretariat of the UNFCCC. In addition, Australia has undertaken to provide update reports at each meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC throughout the fast-start finance period.”

The lies continue as GreenLaboUr treats voters like fools.

How does one trust an Australian Journalist?

Following on from the previous post, “How does one trust an Australian Climate Scientist,” a leading Australian Climate Scientist, Prof. Paul Chubb, a MAJOR player in the ‘death threat to scientists’ scandal, appears at the Australian National Press Club, misleading a respected  journalist institution.

As with so many other people who ‘believe’ in man made catastrophic global warming’, compromise, hypocrisy and a lack of morality catches them out.

The following email was sent to  the NPC:

To whom it may concern,

On 24th May 2012, (6 days ago) Professor Ian Chubb unequivocally led the National Press Club of Australia to believe that the “Death Threats” were real and he had acted properly by relocating the scientists concerned.

See video of Ian Chubb’s address and in particular question put to him by Christian Kerr of the Australian at 30mins 40seconds of the video.
Video of Ian Chubb’s Address

On the face of it, having regard to his reported evidence to the Senate Committee Ian Chubb fair and square and carefully mislead the National Press Club.


Why did Chubb provide those answers, when he now admits he never read the offending emails?

The NPC awarded this ‘misleader of the truth’ for his ‘misleading’ efforts.

Will the NPC take back the free membership and/or demand a apology?

Is there not one journalist in the NPC prepared to seek the truth or reason why this man needed to exaggerate?

This scandal has a long way to go, like a snowball traveling downhill, as it is more than just misleading the NPC, but goes to the heart of journalism and it’s desire to tell the truth.

Remember, the internet never forgets.

Regards,
******
As of this posting, no reply, no action, nothing from the NPC.
There is SO much wrong with this.
This is evidence the Australian media has abandoned its principles.
If they respond to the email, there will be an update.

Shub Niggurath Climate

Let us get this:

1) A certain number of climate scientists in Australia receive emails. These are characterized as ‘death threats.’ The alleged threats are publicized worldwide in Nature and the Guardian

2) Much after the news is disseminated and public sympathy garnered, the threatening emails are released under FOI to the blog owner of Australian Climate Madness

3) The emails contain no threats. Understandably enough, those at the centre of the event, still, do not want to be seen condoning any form of abuse. Discussion is stultified by reaffirmations of the virtues of civility.

… but …,

4) There do not seem to be any death threats.

View original post 186 more words

Man Made Climate Change Tackled! Global Warming Over!

January 4, 2008

This drought may never break

IT MAY be time to stop describing south-eastern Australia as gripped by drought and instead accept the extreme dry as permanent, one of the nation’s most senior weather experts warned yesterday.

“Perhaps we should call it our new climate,” said the Bureau of Meteorology’s head of climate analysis, David Jones.

“There is a debate in the climate community, after … close to 12 years of drought, whether this is something permanent. Certainly, in terms of temperature, that seems to be our reality, and that there is no turning back.

* * * * * * * * *

May 17, 2011

Summer of disaster ‘not climate change’: Rajendra Pachauri

SPECIFIC natural disasters such as Cyclone Yasi and the Brisbane floods could not be directly linked to man-made climate change, the world’s leading climate change authority said yesterday.

* * * * * * * * *

April 27, 2012

It’s official: Australia no longer in drought

Australia will be officially drought-free for the first time in more than a decade from Monday.

May 08, 2012

Desert rain brings boom to Birdsville

The emblematic outback town of Birdsville in far western Queensland is enjoying one of its best run of seasons in living memory, with three years of flooding rains transforming its desert landscape.

March 2012

Lake Eyre Gallery

Photographs of four years of flood at Lake Eyre. (2009, 2010, 2011, 2012)

* * * * * * * * *

If drought/flood is the proof of man made global warming, or ‘man made’ climate change (generic), than, global warming/climate change has been tackled.

A carbon tax is  no longer needed in Australia.